Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Ukraiński (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Katalog Bibliotek Uniwersytetu Śląskiego i Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaKatalog Bibliotek Uniwersytetu Śląskiego i Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach

Wyszukujesz frazę "Wsp%C3%B3%C5%82praca transgraniczna - Europa %C5%9Arodkowa - 1990-." wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów

Ogranicz do:

Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-20 z 1638
Tytuł:
Transgraniczna przestrzeń turystyczna obszarów morskich i nadmorskich na przykładzie Morza Bałtyckiego - próba wyjaśnienia pojęcia.
Autorzy:
Cerić, Denis
Pokaż więcej
Alternatywny tytuł:
Cross-border tourism space in maritime and seaside areas as exemplified by the Baltic Sea Region - an attempt at explaining the concept.
Źródło:
Polish Geographical Review / Przegląd Geograficzny. 2019, Vol. 91 Issue 4, p531-551. 21p.
Czasopismo naukowe
Pełny tekst  Link otwiera się w nowym oknieSzczegóły
Tytuł:
Pogranicze w trakcie przemian. Rozwój i wspópraca transgraniczna regionów Polski Wschodniej i państw sąsiednich w kontekście integracji europejskiej.
Autorzy:
J. S. T.
Pokaż więcej
Alternatywny tytuł:
Borderland Transformations: Development of and Cross-border Cooperation between Poland's Eastern Regions and the Neighboring Countries in the Context of European Integration.
Źródło:
Polish Quarterly of International Affairs. Autumn2009, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p89-90. 2p.
Recenzja
Pełny tekst  Link otwiera się w nowym oknieSzczegóły
Tytuł:
POZYCJA TRANSGRANICZNA JELENIEJ GÓRY: KORZYŚCI I BARIERY DLA ROZWOJU.
Autorzy:
Kłosowski, Jarosław
Najar, Sergiusz
Pokaż więcej
Alternatywny tytuł:
TRANSBORDER POSITIONS OF JELENIA GÓRA: BENEFITS AND BARRIERS TO THE DEVELOPMENT.
Źródło:
Research Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics / Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wroclawiu. 2014, Issue 332, p200-210. 11p.
Czasopismo naukowe
Pełny tekst  Link otwiera się w nowym oknieSzczegóły
Tytuł:
Transgraniczna przestrzeń turystyczna obszarów morskich i nadmorskich na przykładzie Morza Bałtyckiego – próba wyjaśnienia pojęcia = Cross-border tourism space in maritime and seaside areasa s exemplified by the Baltic Sea Region – an attempt at explaining the concept ; Przegląd Geograficzny T. 91 z. 4 (2019)
Autorzy:
Cerić, Denis. Autor
Pokaż więcej
Temat:
maritime tourism space
seaside tourism space
Baltic Sea Region
cross-border cooperation
cross-border integration
morska przestrzeń turystyczna
nadmorska przestrzeń turystyczna
region Morza Bałtyckiego
współpraca transgraniczna
integracja transgraniczna
Źródło:
CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.181, Cz.3136, Cz.4187 ; http://195.187.71.2/ipac20/ipac.jsp?profile=geogpan&index=BOCLC&term=gg96601183 ; CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.181, Cz.3136, Cz.4187
Opis pliku:
File size 1,4 MB; application/octet-stream; Rozmiar pliku 1,4 MB
Relacje:
Przegląd Geograficzny; Altvater S., Fletcher R., Passarello C., 2019, The Need for Marine Spatial Planning in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction, [w:] J. Zaucha, K. Gee (red.), Maritime Spatial Planning: past, present, future, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, s. 397-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98696-8_17; Blasco D., Guia J., Prats L., 2014, Emergence of governance in cross-border destinations, Annals of Tourism Research, 49, s. 159-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2014.09.002; Boggs S.W., 1932, Boundary functions and the principles of boundary making, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 22, s. 48-59.; Borsa M., 2004, Gospodarka i polityka przestrzenna, Wyższa Szkoła Społeczno-Ekonomiczna w Warszawie, Warszawa.; Brunet-Jailly E., 2011, Special section: Borders, borderlands and theory: An introduction. Geopolitics, 16, 1, s. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2010.493765; Bufon M., 2002, Experiences of Cross-Border Cooperation in the Upper Adriatic, Regional & Federal Studies, 12, 4, s. 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/714004771; Butowski L., 2009, Turystyka w polityce spójności gospodarczej i społecznej Unii Europejskiej w latach 1994–1999 i 2000–2006: uwarunkowania teoretyczne, zakres rzeczowy, finansowy i przestrzenny, Difin, Warszawa.; Butowski L., 2014, Morska przestrzeń turystyczna, Turyzm, 24, 1, s. 57-64. https://doi.org/10.2478/tour-2014-0006; Cerić D., 2018, Cruise tourism: from regional saturation towards global dynamic equilibrium, [w:] D. Müller, M. Więckowski (red.), Tourism in Transitions. Geographies of Tourism and Global Change, Springer, Cham, s. 59-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64325-0_4; Cerić D., Więckowski M., 2019, Współpraca transgraniczna w regionie Morza Bałtyckiego jako element kreowania przestrzeni turystycznej, [w:] A. Cedro (red.), Polska Geografia Morza. Przyrodnicze i społeczno-ekonomiczne badania morza i obszarów nadmorskich, Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Szczecin, s. 29-44.; CoE1980, European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co-operation between Territorial Communities or Authorities, Rada Europy, Treaty No. 106, Madrid, 21/05/1980 (https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/0900001680078b0c, 15.06.2019).; Dziewoński K., 1988, Teoretyczne problem gospodarki przestrzennej, Biuletyn KPZK PAN, 138.; EC, 2007, Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007, Komisja Europejska, Official Journal of the European Union, C 306.; EC, 2016, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Region, International ocean governance: an agenda for the future of our oceans, Brussels, 10.11.2016, Komisja Europejska, JOIN (2016), 49.; Escach E., Vaudor L., 2014, Réseaux de villes et processus de recomposition des niveaux: le cas des villes baltiques, Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, 679 (http://journals.openedition.org/cybergeo/26336, 10.09.2018). https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.26336; EUNETMAR, 2013, Study on Blue Growth, Maritime Policy and the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region, https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/maritimeforum/en/node/3550 (10.09.2019).; Faby H., 2006, Tourism Policy Tools Applied by the European Union to Support Cross-border Tourism, [w:] H. Wachowiak (red.), Tourism and Borders Contemporary Issues, Policies and International Research, Ashgate, Aldershot, s. 19-30.; Fedyk W., Meyer B., Potocki J., 2017, Nowa koncepcja zarządzania regionami turystycznymi, Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, 4, 5, s. 60-81. https://doi.org/10.18559/SOEP.2017.4.3; Franckx E., 1996, Maritime Boundaries in the Baltic Sea: Past, Present and Future, Maritime Briefing, 2, 2, s. 1-25.; Gorzym-Wilkowski W.A., 2005, Region transgraniczny na tle podstawowych pojęć geograficznych - próba syntezy, Przegląd Geograficzny, 77, 2, s. 235-252.; Grzybowski M., 2011, Ekonomiczno-infrastrukturalne uwarunkowania rozwoju portów morskich w regionie Morza Bałtyckiego, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 15, s. 161-172.; Guoa Y., Kimb S., Timothy D.J., Wangd K.-C., 2006, Tourism and reconciliation between Mainland China and Taiwan, Tourism Management, 27, s. 997-1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.08.001; Gwizdała J., 2015, Euroregiony jako forma współpracy transgranicznej w Europie, Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 74, 2, s. 449-458.; Haas E.B., 1958, The Uniting of Europe, Stanford University Press, Stanford.; Haas E.B., 1964, Beynod the Nation-state, Functionalism and International Organization, Stanford University Press, Stanford.; Hartmann K., 2006, Destination management in crossborder regions, [w:] H. Wachowiak (red.), Tourism and borders: Contemporary issues, policies and international research, Ashgate, Burlington, s. 89-109.; Harvey D., 1973, Social Justice and the City, London.; Herrschel T., 2011, Borders in Post-socialist Europe: Territory, Scale, Society, Ashgate, Farnham.; Jerabek M., 2015, Role of tourism in cross-border cooperation - example of Czech -Saxon borderland, Conference Proceeding of the 10th International Conference on Topical Issues of Tourism, Jihlava, s. 190-201.; Leszczycki S., 1972, Pojęcie czynnika przestrzeni i jego rola we współczesnej gospodarce, [w:] K. Secomski (red.), Elementy teorii planowania przestrzennego, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa, s. 5-32.; Kałuski S., 2017, Blizny historii. Geografia granic politycznych współczesnego świata, Dialog, Warszawa.; Kizielewicz J., 2012, Współpraca międzynarodowa w basenie Morza Bałtyckiego na rzecz rozwoju turystyki morskiej, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Gdyni, 77, s. 27-40.; Klemeshev A.P., Korneevets V.S., Palmowski T., Studzieniecki T., Fedorov G.M., 2017, Approaches to the Definition of the Baltic Sea Region, Baltiс Region, 9, 4. s. 4-20. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2017-4-1; Kolosov V., Więckowski M., 2018, Border changes in Central and Eastern Europe, Geographia Polonica, 91, 1, s. 5-16. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0106; Kowalczyk A., 2014, The Phenomenology of Tourism Space, Tourism, 24, 1, s. 9-15. https://doi.org/10.2478/tour-2014-0001; Kruczek Z., 2017, Regiony czy destynacje turystyczne. Kontrowersje wokół definiowania i nazywania, Ekonomiczne Problemy Turystyki, 37, 1, s. 39-47. https://doi.org/10.18276/ept.2017.1.37-03; Marczak M., Borzyszkowski J., 2009, Region (obszar) jako produkt turystyczny, Zeszyty Naukowe Instytutu Ekonomii i Zarządzania, 13, s. 117-126.; Martinez O.J., 1994, The dynamics of border interaction - New approaches to border analysis, [w:] C.H. Schofield (red.), World boundaries, global boundaries, 1, Routledge, London, s. 1-15.; Mayer M., Zbaraszewski W., Pieńkowski D., Gach G., Gernert J., 2019, Cross-Border Tourism in Protected Areas: Potentials, Pitfalls and Perspectives, Geographies of Tourism and Global Change, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05961-3; Mączak A., Samsonowicz H., 1962, Z zagadnień genezy rynku europejskiego: strefa bałtycka, Przegląd Historyczny, 52,2, s. 198-222.; Meyer B., 2008, Kształtowanie układów przestrzenno-funkcjonalnych przez turystykę, Rozprawy i Studia, 676, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin.; Milewski D., 2014, Finansowanie przedsięwzięć turystycznych z funduszy unijnych w latach 2007-2013, [w:] A. Panasiuk (red.), Fundusze Unii Europejskiej w gospodarce turystycznej, Difin, Warszawa, s. 109-115.; Nilsson J.H., Eskilsson L., Ek R., 2010, Creating cross-border destinations: Interreg programmes and regionalisation in the Baltic Sea area, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 10, s. 153-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250903561978; Nilsson J.H., 2018, Mobility and regionalisation: Changing patterns of air traffic in the Baltic Sea Region in connection to European integration, Geographia Polonica, 91, 1, s. 77-93. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0092; Paasi A., 1996, Territories, boundaries and consciousness, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.; Pacuk M., Palmowski T., Tarkowski M., 2018, The emergence of Baltic Europe, an overview of Polish research on regional integration, Quaestiones Geographicae, 37, 2, s. 47-60. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0013; Palmowski T., 2000, Rola regionów transgranicznych w procesie integracji Europy Bałtyckiej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk.; Palmowski T., 2002, Współpraca transgraniczna obszarów nadmorskich na przykładzie Euroregionu Bałtyk, [w:] A. Stasiak, Euroregiony wschodniego pogranicza - założenia i osiągnięcia, Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomicznej w Białymstoku, Białystok, s. 111-121.; Palmowski T., 2011, Bałtycki cruising, Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 18, s. 97-107.; Palmowski T., 2017, Baltic Europe - 40 years of integration, Studia Regionalia, 52, s. 41-57. https://doi.org/10.12657/studreg-52-03; Parysek J., 2007, Wprowadzenie do gospodarki przestrzennej. Wybrane aspekty praktyczne, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań.; Portman M.E., 2007, Zoning design for cross-border marine protected areas: The Red Sea Marine Peace Park case study, Ocean & Coastal Management, 50, s. 499-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2007.02.008; Prescott J.R.V., 1987, Political frontiers and boundaries, Unvin Hyman, London.; Prokkola E.K., 2007, Cross-border Regionalization and Tourism Development at the Swedish-Finnish Border: 'Destination Arctic Circle', Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 7, 2, s. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250701226022; Prokkola E.K., 2008, Resources and barriers in tourism development: cross-border cooperation, regionalization and destination building at the Finnish-Swedish border, FENNIA 186, 1, s. 31-46.; Prokkola E.K., Lois M., 2016, Scalar politics of border heritage: an examination of the EU's northern and southern border areas, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 16, 1, s. 14-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2016.1244505; Pyć D., 2019, The Role of the Law of the Sea in Marine Spatial Planning, [w:] J. Zaucha, K. Gee (red.), Maritime Spatial Planning: past, present, future, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, s. 375-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98696-8_16; Ricq Ch., 2006, Handbook of transfrontier co-operation, Edition, Paris.; Sadoff C., Grey D., 2002, Beyond the river: the benefits of cooperation on international rivers, Water Policy, 4, s. 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00035-1; Saarinen J., 2017, Enclavic tourism spaces territorialization and bordering in tourism destination development and planning, Tourism Geographies, 19, 3, s. 425-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2016.1258433; Skrzeszewska K., 2012, Popyt na usługi noclegowe świadczone w basenie Morza Bałtyckiego na tle popytu na usługi turystyczne w Unii Europejskiej, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług, 82, s. 139-151.; Stålvant C.-E., Westermann R., 1996, Actors around the Baltic Sea. An inventory of infrastructures: Initiatives, Agreements and Actors. Compiled for the Baltic Sea States Summit 1996, Stockholm.; Stegner T., 2009, Granice w Europie Bałtyckiej, [w:] T. Studzieniecki (red.), Granice, współpraca i turystyka w Europie Bałtyckiej, Academia Europa Nostra, Gdynia - Lubieszynek, s. 48-59.; Stoffelen A., Vanneste D., 2017, Tourism and cross-border regional development: insights in European contexts, European Planning Studies, 25, 6, s. 1013-1033. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1291585; Studzieniecki T., 2009, Granice, współpraca i turystyka w Europie Bałtyckiej: zbiór studiów, Academia Europa Nostra, Gdynia - Lubieszynek.; Studzieniecki T., 2016, The development of cross-border cooperation in an EU macroregion - a case study of the Baltic Sea Region, Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, s. 235-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30318-5; Studzieniecki T., Meyer B., 2017, The programming of tourism development in Polish cross-border areas during the 2007-2013 period, 6th Central European Conference in Regional Science - CERS, s. 506-516.; Studzieniecki T., Palmowski T., 2019, Delimitacja destynacji turystycznej na przykładzie Regionu Morza Bałtyckiego, [w:] E. Wszendybył-Skulska, M. Dębski (red.), Marketing turystyczny, Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 20, 2, 1, s. 91-107.; Timothy D.J., 1995, Political boundaries and tourism: Borders as tourist attractions, Tourism Management, 16, 7, s. 525-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5177(95)00070-5; Timothy D.J., 1999, Cross-Border Partnership in Tourism Resource Management: International Parks along the US-Canada Border, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 7, 3-4, s. 182-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669589908667336; Timothy D.J., Saarinen J., 2013, Cross-border cooperation and tourism in Europe, [w:] C. Costa, E. Panyik, D. Buhalis (red.), Trends in European tourism planning and organisation, Channel View Publications, Bristol. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845414122-009; Toczyski W., Lendzion J., Zaucha J., 2007, Turystyka zrównoważona w Europie Bałtyckiej. Produkty, sieci współpracy i marketing, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk.; Tosun C., Timothy D.J., Parpairis A., Macdonald D., 2005, Cross-border cooperation in tourism marketing growth strategies, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 18, 1, s. 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1300/J073v18n01_02; Tyldesley D., 2004, Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Framework for the Irish Sea Pilot Project, Defra, London.; UNCLOS, 1982, The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf (17.08.2019).; Vitale A., 2011, The contemporary EU's notion of territoriality and external borders, European Spatial Research And Policy, 18, 2, s. 17-27. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10105-011-0010-3; Wallace H., Wallace W., Pollack M.A., 2005, Policy-making in the European Union, Oxford University Press, Oxford - New York.; Wanagos M., 2000, Wpływ dostępności turystycznej na kształtowanie produktu turystycznego regionu, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Problemy Zarządzania, Finansów i Marketingu, 2, s. 233-241.; Warszyńska J., Jackowski A., 1979, Podstawy geografii turyzmu, PWN, Warszawa.; Wassenberg B., Reitel B., Peyrony J., Rubiò J., 2015, Territorial cooperation in Europe. A historical perspective, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.; Weidenfeld A., 2013, Tourism and Cross-border regional innovation systems, Annals of Tourism Research, 42, s. 191-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.01.003; Więckowski M., 2002, Development of the new tourist space of the Western Carpathian Mts. in the 1990s, [w:] T. Komornicki, H. Powęska (red.), Slovakia and Poland Urban, social and demographic questions. Relations between neighbours, Europa XXI, 7, IGiPZ PAN, OAPTG, Warszawa, s. 121-131.; Więckowski, M., 2004, Przyrodnicze uwarunkowania kształtowania się polsko-słowackich więzi transgranicznych, Prace Geograficzne, 195, IGiPZ PAN, Warszawa.; Więckowski M., 2008, Integracja przestrzeni turystycznej na pograniczach w Unii Europejskiej, [w:] D. Ilnicki, K. Janc (red.), Przekształcenia regionalnych struktur funkcjonalno-przestrzennych, "Europa bez granic" - nowe wyzwania, Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Wrocław, s. 201-209.; Więckowski M., 2010, Turystyka na obszarach przygranicznych Polski, Prace Geograficzne, 224, IGiPZ PAN, Warszawa.; Więckowski M., 2014, Tourism space: an attempt at a fresh look, Tourism, 24, 1, s. 17-24. https://doi.org/10.2478/tour-2014-0002; Więckowski M., 2018, From periphery and the doubled national trails to the cross-border thematic trails: New cross-border tourism in Poland, [w:] D.K. Müller, M. Więckowski (red.), Tourism in transitions. Recovering decline, managing change, Geographies of Tourism and Global Change, Springer, Cham, s. 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64325-0_10; Więckowski M., Cerić D., 2016, Evolving tourism on the Baltic Sea coast: perspectives on change in the Polish maritime borderland, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 16, 1, s. 98-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2016.1244598; Włodarczyk B., 2007, Przestrzeń turystyczna - pojęcie, wymiary i cechy, Turyzm, 17, 1-2, s. 149-162.; Zaleski J., Wojewódka C., 1977, Europa Bałtycka, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław - Warszawa - Kraków - Gdańsk.; Zaucha J., 2007, Rola przestrzeni w kształtowaniu relacji gospodarczych. Ekonomiczne fundamenty planowania przestrzennego w Europie Bałtyckiej, Fundacja Rozwoju Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk.; Zaucha J., 2008, Sea Use Planning and ICZM Input to the Long Term Spatial Development Perspective, Final report from working group 3, Vision and Strategies around the Baltic Sea, Riga, https://vasab.org/wp-content/themes/vasab/assets/eww/documents/EWW_WG3_final_report.doc (13.08.2019).; Zaucha J., 2018, Gospodarowanie przestrzenią morską, Wydawnictwo Akademickie SEDNO, Warszawa.; Zaucha J., Pyć D., Böhme K., Neumann L., Aziewicz D., 2020, EU Macro-Regional Strategies for the Baltic Sea Region after 2020. A nutshell of beauty and possibilities, Europa XXI, 38 (w druku). https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2020.38.1; oai:rcin.org.pl:publication:138894; https://rcin.org.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/111573/content; oai:rcin.org.pl:111573
Dostępność:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98696-8_17
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2014.09.002
https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2010.493765
https://doi.org/10.2478/tour-2014-0006
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64325-0_4
https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.26336
https://doi.org/10.18559/SOEP.2017.4.3
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.08.001
https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2017-4-1
https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0106
Czasopismo naukowe
Szczegóły
Tytuł:
Europa XXI 39 (2020 ) ; Lessons from the Danish-German Border Region for Post 2020 Interreg A – an Alignment with Cross-Border Functional Regions? .
Autorzy:
Klatt, Martin. Autor
Winkler, Ingo. Autor
Pokaż więcej
Temat:
cross-border cooperation
INTERREG
lobbyism
territorial cooperation
współpraca transgraniczna
lobbing
współpraca terytorialna
Źródło:
CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; http://195.187.71.2/ipac20/ipac.jsp?profile=geogpan&index=BOCLC&term=bb99159581 ; CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407
Opis pliku:
application/octet-stream
Relacje:
Andersen, D. J., & Sandberg, M. (2012). Introduction. In D. J., Andersen, M., Klatt & M., Sandberg (Eds.). The Border Multiple. The Practicing of Borders between Public Policy and Everyday Life in a Re-Scaling Europe (pp. 1-19). Farnham: Ashgate.; Andersen, D. J., & Winkler, I. (2020). Grænsearbejde blandt grænsependlere. Økonomi og Politik, 93(2), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.7146/okonomi-og-politik.v93i2.120951; Barten, U., Bröcker, J., Herrmann, H., & Klatt, M. (2006). Barrieren und Potentiale der grenzüberschreitenden Zusammenarbeit in der Fehmarnbelt Region. Kiel: Institut für Regionalforschung der Universität Kiel. Retrieved from https://www.re2.uni-kiel.de/de/archiv/forschung/beitraege-aus-dem-institut-fuer-regionalforschung/beitrag-41; Blatter, J. (2004). From 'spaces of place' to 'spaces of flow'? Territorial and functional governance in cross-border regions in Europe and North America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, 530-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00534.x; Blatter, J., & Clement, N. (2000). Transborder Collaboration in Europe and North America: Explaining Similarities and Differences. In M., van der Velde & H., van Houtum (Eds.). Borders, Regions and People (pp. 85-103). London: Pion.; Blatter, J., Kreutzer, M., Rentl, M., & Thiele, J. (2008). The Foreign Relations of European Regions: Competences and Strategies. West European Politics, 31, 464-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380801939743; Brambilla, C. (2015). Exploring the Critical Potential of the Borderscapes Concept. Geopolitics, 20, 14-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2014.884561; Brunet-Jailly, E. (2005). Theorizing Borders: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Geopolitics, 10, 633-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318449; Bröcker, J., & Schneider, M. (2002). How Does Economic Development in Eastern Europe Affect Austria's Regions? A Multiregional General Equilibrium Framework. Journal of Regional Science, 42(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9787.00258; Buch, T., Dall Schmidt, T., & Niebuhr, A. (2009). Cross-border commuting in the Danish-German border region - integration, institutions and cross-border interaction. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 24(2), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2009.9695726; Castells, M. (1998). The Rise of the Network Society. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.; Chilla, T., Altena, B., & Neufeld, M. (2016). Regionalentwicklung. Stuttgart: UTB.; Clement, N. C. (2004). Economic Forces Shaping the Borderlands. In V., Pavlakovich-Kochi, B. J., Morehouse & D., Wastl-Walther (Eds.). Challenged Borderlands. Transcending Political and Cultural Boundaries (pp. 41-62). Aldershot: Ashgate.; Commission, D.-G. T. (2015). Transport Infrastructure in the Jutland Corridor. Copenhagen: The Danish Ministry of Transport and Building.; Crescenzi, R., & Giua, M. (2020). One or many Cohesion Policies of the European Union? On the differential economic impacts of Cohesion Policy across member states. Regional Studies, 54, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1665174; DTBF (2020). Dansk-Tysk Business Forum. Retrieved from https://www.soenderjylland.dk/samarbejde/dansk-tysk-business-forum/; EC (2017). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament 'Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions'. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/cooperation/european-territorial/cross-border/review/#1; EC (2020). Interreg : European Territorial Co-operation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/cooperation/european-territorial/; EC (2020). New Cohesion Policy. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/2021_2027/; Eden, L. (2010). Letter from the Editor-in-Chief: JIBS Publication Criteria and Their Consequences. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7), 1093-1098. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.33; Engl, A., & Evrard, E. (2020). Agenda-setting dynamics in the post-2020 cohesion policy reform: the pathway towards the European cross-border mechanism as possible policy change. Journal of European Integration, 42(7), 917-935. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1689969; Evrard, E. (2016). The European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC): Towards a Supraregional Scale of Governance in the Greater Region SaarLorLux? Geopolitics, 21(3), 513-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2015.1104667; Gabbe, J., von Malchus, V., & Stumm, T. (2008). Cooperation Between European Border Regions. Reviews and Perspectives. Baden Baden: Nomos.; Guillermo Ramírez, M. (2018). The Added Value of European Territorial Cooperation. Drawing from Case Studies. In E., Medeiros (Ed.). European Territorial Cooperation. Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to the Process and Impacts of Cross-Border and Transnational Cooperation in Europe (pp. 25-47). Cham: Springer.; Hall, P. (2008). Opportunities for Democracy in Cross-border Regions? Lessons from the Øresund Region. Regional Studies, 42(3), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701281592; IDD (2020). Interreg Deutschland-Dänemark. Retrieved from https://www.interreg5a.eu/; van Houtum, H., Kramsch, O., & Zierhofer, W. (Eds.). (2005). B/ordering Space. Aldershot: Ashgate.; Keating, M. (1998). The New Regionalism in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.; Keating, M. (1998). The new regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial restructuring and political change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.; Keating, M. (2004). Regions and Regionalism in Europe. Cheltenham, Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.; Keating, M. (2008). A Quarter Century of the Europe of the Regions. Regional & Federal Studies, 18(5), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560802351630; Klatt, M. (2006). Fra modspil til medspil?: grænseoverskridende samarbejde i Sønderjylland/Schleswig 1945-2005. Aabenraa: Institut for Grænseregionsforskning.; Klatt, M. (2008). Dansk international landevejstransport: en branche og dens forening i konstant udvikling. Sønderborg: Institut for Grænseregionsforskning.; Klatt, M. (2013). Transportbranchen. En vigtig del af Sønderjyllands erhvervshistorie. In H. S., Hansen, E., Vestergaard & T. A., Vestergaard (Eds.). Sønderjysk Erhvervshistorie 1800-2000 (pp. 187-206). Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.; Klatt, M. (2014). (Un)Familiarity? Labor Related Cross-Border Mobility in Sønderjylland/Schleswig since Denmark Joined the EC in 1973. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 29(3), 353-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2014.938968; Klatt, M. (2017). Dybbøl 2014. Constructing Familiarity by Remembrance? In E., Boesen & G., Schnuer (Eds.). European Borderlands. Living with Bridges and Barriers (pp. 30-46). Milton Park: Routledge.; Klatt, M. (2020). What has happened to our cross border regions? Corona, Unfamiliarity and transnational borderlander activism in the Danish German border region. In C., Wille & R., Kanesu (Eds.). Borders in Pandemic Times. Insights into the Covid-19 lockdown (pp. 43-47). Luxembourg/Trier: University of Luxemburg/Trier University.; Klatt, M., & Herrmann, H. (2011). Half Empty or Half Full? Over 30 Years of Regional Cross-Border Cooperation Within the EU: Experiences at the Dutch-German and Danish-German Border. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 26, 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2011.590289; Knippschild, R., & Vock, A. (2017). The conformance and performance principles in territorial cooperation: a critical reflection on the evaluation of INTERREG projects. Regional Studies, 51(11), 1735-1745. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1255323; Krätke, S. (1996). Where East meets West: The German-Polish border region in transformation. European Planning Studies, 4(6), 647-669. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319608720372; Kurowska-Pysz, J. (2016). Opportunities for Cross-Border Entrepreneurship Development in a Cluster Model Exemplified by the Polish-Czech Border Region. Sustainability, 8(3), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030230; Lambertz, K. H. (2011). L'état de la cooperation transfrontalière en Europe. In B., Wassenberg & J., Beck (Eds.). Living and researching cross-border cooperation: the European dimension (pp. 59-67). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.; Lange, E. (2018). Cross-border Cooperation in Action: Taking a Closer Look at the Galicia - North of Portugal European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 33(3), 415-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2016.1195701; Leick, B. (2011). Barriers to co-operation and competitive advantage: crossborder business networks of Saxon and Northern Bohemian firms. Journal for East European Management Studies, 16(2), 162-184. https://doi.org/10.2307/23281854; Lundquist, K.-J., & Winther, L. (2006). The Interspace between Denmark and Sweden: The Industrial Dynamics of the Öresund Cross-Border Region. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 106(1), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2006.10649549; Löfgren, O. (2008). Regionauts: the Transformation of Cross-Border Regions in Scandinavia. European Urban and Regional Studies, 15(3), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776408090418; Martinez, O. J. (1994). Border People. Life and Society in the U.S.-Mexico Borderlands. Tucson/London: University of Arizona Press.; Medeiros, E. (2011). (Re)defining the Euroregion Concept. European Planning Studies, 19(1), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.531920; Medeiros, E. (2018). The Role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) in EU Cohesion Policy. In E., Medeiros (Ed.). European Territorial Cooperation. Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to the Process and Impacts of Cross-Border and Transnational Cooperation in Europe (pp. 69-93). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_5; Medeiros, E. (2019). Spatial Planning, Territorial Development, and Territorial Impact Assessment. Journal of Planning Literature, 34(2), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412219831375; Nehrt, L., Truitt, J., & Wright, R. W. (1970). International Business Research: Past, Present, Future. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Graduate School of Business.; O'Dell, T. (2003). Øresund and the Regionauts. European Studies: A Journal of European Culture, History and Politics, 19, 31-53. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401201391_003; Ohmae, K. (1990). Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Global Marketplace. London: Harper Collins.; Paudel, U. R., & Devkota, N. (2018). Socio-economic influences on small business performance in Nepal-India open border: Evidence from cross-sectional analysis. Economics and Sociology, 11(4), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-4/1; Perkmann, M. (2007) Policy entrepreneurship and multilevel governance: a comparative study of European cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 25(6), 861-879. https://doi.org/10.1068/c60m; Perkmann, M., & Sum, N.-L. (2002). Globalization, Regionalization and Cross-Border Regions. Basingstoke/New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.; Pucher, J., Stumm, T., & Schneidewind, P. (2017). Easing legal and administrative obstacles in EU border regions. Brussels: European Commission.; Paasi, A. (2009). The resurgence of the 'region' and 'regional identity': theoretical perspectives and empirical observations on regional dynamics in Europe. Review of International Studies, 35, 121-146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008456; Reitel, B., Wassenberg, B., & Peyrony, J. (2018). The INTERREG Experience in Bridging European Territories. In E., Medeiros (Ed.). European Territorial Cooperation. Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to the Process and Impact of Cross-Border and Transnational Cooperation in Europe (pp. 7-24). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_2; RSS (2020). Region Sønderjylland-Schleswig. Retrieved from https://www.region.dk/region/dk/ueber_uns/region/DatenundFaktenRegionSjSl_dk.php; Rumford, C. (2008) Introduction: Citizens and Borderwork in Europe. Space and Polity, 12(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562570801969333; Schack, M., & Dall Schmidt, T. (2005). Grænseoverskridende erhvervsstrategi for Region Sønderjylland-Schleswig. Aabenraa: Institut for Grænseregionsforskning.; Schmidt, T. D., & Jensen, P. S. (2012). Social networks and regional recruitment of foreign labour: Firm recruitment methods and spatial sorting in Denmark. Papers in Regional Science, 91(4), 795-821. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00424.x; Schmitt-Egner, P. (1998). 'Grenzüberschreitende Zusammenarbeit' in Europa als Gegenstand wissenschaftlicher Forschung und Strategie transnationaler Praxis. Anmerkungen zur Theorie, Empirie und Praxis des Transnationalen Regionalismus. In G., Brunn & P., Schmitt-Egner (Eds.). Grenzüberschreitende Zusammenarbeit in Europa. Theorie - Empirie - Praxis (pp. 27-77). Baden Baden: Nomos.; Schmitt-Egner, P. (2001). 'Transnationaler Regionalismus' als Gegenstand der Politikwissenschaft. In: J., Bellers & C., Rosenthal (Eds.). Die gesellschaftliche Basis von Aussenpolitik. Internationale Wirtschaft, Umwelt, Ideologien, Regional- und Entwicklungspolitik (pp. 386-441). Münster: Lit-Verlag.; Schrader, K., & Laaser, C.-F. (2020). Industrielle Strukturen und Potentiale im Norden: Eine regionale Analyse der deutsch-dänischen Industrielandschaft. Kieler Beiträte zur Wirtschaftspolitik. Kiel: Institut für Weltwirtschaft.; Scott, J. W. (2000). Euroregions, Governance, and Transborder Cooperation Within the EU. In M., van der Velde & H., van Houtum (Eds.). Borders, Regions and People (pp. 104-115). London: Pion.; Sohn, C. (2014). The Border as a Resource in the Global Urban Space: A Contribution to the Cross-Border Metropolis Hypothesis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5), 1697-1711. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12071; Spierings, B., & van der Velde, M. (2013). Cross-Border Differences and Unfamiliarity: Shopping Mobility in the Dutch-German Rhine-Waal Euroregion. European Planning Studies, 21(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.716236; Spierings, B., & van der Velde, M. (2013). Cross-Border Mobility, Unfamiliarity and Development Policy in Europe. European Planning Studies, 21(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.716235; Svensson, S., & Balogh, P. (2018). Limits to Integration: Persisting Border Obstacles in the EU. In E., Medeiros (Ed.). European Territorial Cooperation. Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to the Process and Impacts of Cross-Border and Transnational Cooperation in Europe (pp. 115-134). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_7; Sønderjylland, U. (2020). Porten til Europa. Aabenraa: Udviklingsråd Sønderjylland.; Terlouw, K. (2012). Border Surfers and Euroregions: Unplanned Cross-Border Behaviour and Planned Territorial Structures of Cross-Border Governance. Planning Practice and Research, 27(3), 351-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.670939; Warleigh-Lack, A., Robinson, N., & Rosamond, B. (Eds.). (2011). New Regionalism and the European Union. Dialogues, comparisons and new research directions. London, New York, NY: Routledge.; Wassenberg, B. (2016). La diplomatie territoriale. Encyclopédie pour une histoire nouvelle de l'Europe. Retrieved form https://ehne.fr/fr/node/12259; Wassenberg, B., Reitel, B., Rubio, J., & Peyrony, J. (2015). Territorial Cooperation in Europe. A Historical Perspective. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.; Europa XXI; oai:rcin.org.pl:publication:218141; https://rcin.org.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/189105/content; oai:rcin.org.pl:189105
Dostępność:
https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2014.884561
https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318449
https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.33
https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319608720372
https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030230
https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2016.1195701
https://doi.org/10.2307/23281854
https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776408090418
https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.531920
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_5
Czasopismo naukowe
Szczegóły
Tytuł:
Europa XXI 43 (2022) ; Cross-border integration patterns in the context of domestic economic development : a case study of the Upper Rhine
Autorzy:
Turner, Clara. Autor
Chilla, Tobias. Autor
Hippe, Stefan. Autor
Pokaż więcej
Temat:
border regions
cohesion
cross-border integration
economic development
network analysis
regiony przygraniczne
spójność
integracja transgraniczna
rozwój gospodarczy
analiza sieciowa
Źródło:
CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; http://195.187.71.2/ipac20/ipac.jsp?profile=geogpan&index=BOCLC&term=bb99159581 ; CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407
Opis pliku:
application/octet-stream
Relacje:
AfA (2018). Beschäftigung nach Wirtschaftszweigen, Monatszahlen. Agentur für Arbeit.; Andersen, D.J., & Prokkola, E. (2022). Introduction: Embedding Borderlands Resilience. In D.J., Andersen & E., Prokkola (Eds.). Borderlands Resilience. Transitions, Adaptation and Resistance at Borders (pp. 1-18). London: Routledge.; Bad Säckingen (2022). Wirtschaftsförderung. Bad Säckingen, Stadt. Retrieved from https://www.bad-saeckingen.de/unsere-stadt/wirtschaft-handel/wirtschaftsfoerderung; Bakry, A., & Growe, A. (2021). Analysing cultural networks in cross-border metropolitan regions. The case of the Upper Rhine region (Germany-Switzerland-France). Erdkunde, 75(3), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2021.03.01; Basboga, K. (2020). The role of open borders and cross-border cooperation in regional growth across Europe. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 7(1). 532-549. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2020.1842800; Bathelt, H., & Glückler, J. (2014). Institutional change in economic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513507823; BFS (2018). STATENT Beschäftigte und Vollzeitäquivalente nach Wirtschaftszweigen. Bundesamt für Statistik.; Blatter, J. (2003). Beyond hierarchies and networks: Institutional logics and change in transboundary spaces. Governance, 16(4), 503-526. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00226; Buch, T., Dall Schmidt, T., & Niebuhr, A. (2009). Cross-border commuting in the Danish-German border region - integration, institutions and cross-border interaction. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 24(2), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2009.9695726; Capello, R., Caragliu, A., & Fratesi, U. (2018). Breaking Down the Border: Physical, Institutional and Cultural Obstacles. Economic Geography, 94(5), 485-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1444988; Cappellano, F., & Makkonen, T. (2020). The proximity puzzle in cross-border regions. Planning Practice and Research, 35(3), 283-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1743921; Chilla, T., & Evrard, E. (2013). Spatial integration revisted - new insights for cross-border and transnational contexts. In F., Holstein, S., Zillmer & K., Böhme (Eds.). Science in support of European Territorial Development and Cohesion. Second ESPON 2013 Scientific Report (pp. 44-49). Luxembourg: ESPON.; Chilla, T., & Heugel, A. (2019). Cross-border commuting dynamics: patterns and driving forces in the Alpine macro-region. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 37(1), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2019.1700822; Chilla, T., & Lambracht, M. (2022). Institutional mapping of cross-border cooperation. INTERREG programme analyses with KEEP data. European Planning Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2058321; Chilla, T., Große, T., Hippe, S., & Walker, B.B. (2022). COVID-19 incidence in border regions: spatiotemporal patterns and border control measures. Public Health, 202, 80-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.11.006; Cooke, P., & Morgan, K. (1993). The network paradigm: New departures in corporate and regional development. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11(5), 543-564. https://doi.org/10.1068/d110543; De Boe, P., Grasland, C., & Healy, A. (1999). Spatial integration. Workgroup 1.4. Study Programme on European Spatial Planning.; Decoville, A., Durand, F., Sohn, C., & Walther, O. (2013). Comparing cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe: Towards a functional typology. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 28(2), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2013.854654; Dörry, S., & Decoville, A. (2016). Governance and transportation policy networks in the cross-border metropolitan region of Luxembourg: A social network analysis. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776413490528; Dörry, S., & Walther, O. (2015). Contested 'relational policy spaces' in two European border regions. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 47, 338-355. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130315p; Durand, F. (2015). Theoretical framework of the cross-border space production: The case of the Eurometropolis Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 30(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2015.1066701; Durand, F., & Perrin, T. (2018). Eurometropolis Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai: Cross-border integration with or without the border? European Urban and Regional Studies, 25(3), 320-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776417704688; EC (2017). Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Brussels: European Commission.; Engl, A. (2016). Bridging borders through institution-building: the EGTC as a facilitator of institutional integration in cross-border regions. Regional and Federal Studies, 26(2), 143-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2016.1158164; ESPON (2010). METROBORDER. Cross-border polycentric metropolitan regions. Final Report. Luxembourg: ESPON.; Evers, D. (2008). Reflections on territorial cohesion and European spatial planning. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geographie, 99(3), 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00463.x; Evrard, E., & Chilla, T. (2021). EUropean (dis)integration: implications for the Cohesion Policy. In D., Rauhut, F., Sielker & A., Humer (Eds.). EU Cohesion Policy and Spatial Governance (pp. 98-114). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.; Farole, T. A., Rodríguez-Pose, & Storper, M. (2011). Cohesion policy in the European Union: Growth, geography, institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 1089-1111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02161.x; Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1304.1186; Galaso, P., & Kovárík, J. (2018). Collaboration networks and innovation: How to define network boundaries. MPRA Paper, 85108.; Giuliani, E., & Pietrobelli, C. (2011). Social network analysis methodologies for the evaluation of cluster development programs. Inter-American Development Bank.; Grenzach-Wyhlen (2022). Wirtschaftsförderung. Grenzach-Wyhlen Stadt. Retrieved from https://www.grenzach-wyhlen.de/de/Wirtschaft-Bauen/Wirtschaftsfoerderung; Guimerá, R., Mossa, S., Turtschi, A., & Nunes Amaral, L. (2005). The worldwide air transportation network: Anomalous centrality, community structure, and cities' global roles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(22), 7794-7799. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0407994102; Harrison, J., & Growe, A. (2014). From places to flows? Planning for the new 'regional world' in Germany. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(1), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412441191; Hippe, S., Bertram, D., & Chilla, T. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic as a catalyst for cross-border cooperation? Lessons learnt for border-regional resilience. Europa XXI, 43, 1. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2022.43.1; Hippe, S., Bertram, D., & Chilla, T. (2023). Convergence and resilience in border regions. European Planning Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2023.2170214; Kossinets, G. (2006). Effects of missing data in social networks. Social Networks, 28, 247-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.07.002; LSCB (2022). Life Sciences Cluster Basel. Retrieved from https://lscb.lifesciencesbasel.com/#/; Makkonen, T., & Rohde, S. (2016). Cross-border regional innovation systems: conceptual backgrounds, empirical evidence and policy implications. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1623-1642. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1184626; Matthiessen, C. (2004). The Öresund Area: Pre- and post-bridge cross-border functional integration: The binational regional question. GeoJournal, 61(1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-005-5234-1; Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Klagenfurt: Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften.; Medeiros, E. (2014). Assessing Territorial Impacts of the EU Cohesion Policy: The Portuguese Case. European Planning Studies, 22(9), 1960-1988. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.813910; Medeiros, E. (2019). Cross-border transports and cross-border mobility in EU border regions. Case studies on transport policy, 7(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.11.001; Meijers, E., Hoogerbrugge, M., & Cardoso, R. (2017). Beyond polycentricity: Does strong integration between cities in polycentric urban regions improve performance? Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geographie, 109(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12292; North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.; Novotný, L., & Böhm, H. (2022). New re-bordering left them alone and neglected: Czech cross-border commuters in German-Czech borderland. European Societies, 24(3), 333-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2022.2052144; OECD (2022). Regional Statistics. OECD.Stat. Retrieved from https://stats.oecd.org/; Paasi, A. (2012). Border studies reanimated: Going beyond the territorial/relational divide. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 44(10), 2303-2309. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45282; Pupier, P. (2020). Spatial evolution of cross-border regions. Contrasted case studies in North-West Europe. European Planning Studies, 28(1), 81-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1623975; Reid, N., & Smith, B. (2009). Social network analysis: Its use in local economic development. Economic Development Journal, 8(3), 48-55.; Reitel, B. (2013). Border temporality and space integration in the European transborder agglomeration of Basel. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 28(2), 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2013.854657; Sohn, C. (2014). Modelling cross-border integration: The role of borders as a resource. Geopolitics, 19(3), 587-608. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2014.913029; Sohn, C., Licheron, J., & Meijers, E. (2021). Border cities: Out of the shadow. Papers in Regional Science, 101(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12653; Sohn, C., Reitel, B., & Walther, O. (2009). Cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe: The case of Basel, Luxembourg and Geneva. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 27(5), 922-939. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0893r; Svensson, S. (2015). The bordered world of cross-border cooperation: The determinants of local government contact networks within Euroregions. Regional and Federal Studies, 25(3), 277-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2015.1043995; Svensson, S., & Nordlund, C. (2015). The building blocks of a Euroregion: Novel metrics to measure cross-border integration. Journal of European Integration, 37(3), 371-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2014.968568; Ter Wal, A., & Boschma, R. (2008). Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytic issues. Annals of Regional Science, 43(3), 739-756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0258-3; van der Broek, J., & Smulders, H. (2015). Institutional hindrances in cross-border regional innovation systems. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 116-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1007158; van Houtum, H., & van der Velde, M. (2004). The power of cross-border labour market immobility. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 95(1), 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0040-747X.2004.00296.x; Walther, O., & Reitel, B. (2013). Cross-border policy networks in the Basel region: the effect of national borders and brokerage roles. Space and Polity, 17, 217-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2013.817515; WFL Lörrach (2022). Wirtschaftsstandort Lörrach. Retrieved from https://www.wfl-loerrach.de/standortportrait/wirtschaftsstandort-loerrach/; WRWT (2022). Drei Nationen wachsen zusammen. Weil am Rhein Wirtschaft and Tourismus . Retrieved from https://w-wt.de/de/wwt/dreilaendereck/; WST Rheinfelden (2022). 100% grenzenlose Möglichkeiten. Retrieved from https://www.wirtschaft-rheinfelden.de/files/www.wifoe-rheinfelden.de/dokumente/Imagebroschuere%20Rheinfelden%202017.pdf; Yang, Z., Algesheimer, R., & Tessone, C. (2016). A comparative analysis of community detection algorithms on artificial networks. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30750; Zukauskaite, E., Trippl, M., & Plechero, M. (2017). Institutional thickness revisited. Economic Geography, 93(4), 325-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1331703; Europa XXI; oai:rcin.org.pl:publication:274905; https://rcin.org.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/238529/content; oai:rcin.org.pl:238529
Dostępność:
https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2020.1842800
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00226
https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2015.1066701
https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2016.1158164
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00463.x
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1304.1186
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.07.002
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-005-5234-1
https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.813910
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.11.001
Czasopismo naukowe
Szczegóły
Tytuł:
Europa XXI 35 (2018) ; How governance counts? Comparative analysis of activity and funding patterns of Central European cross-border cooperation programmes
Autorzy:
Pámer, Zoltán. Autor
Pokaż więcej
Temat:
cohesion policy
territorial governance
cross-border cooperation
Central European countries
polityka spójności
zarządzanie terytorialne
współpraca transgraniczna
kraje Europy Środkowej
Źródło:
CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; http://195.187.71.2/ipac20/ipac.jsp?profile=geogpan&index=BOCLC&term=bb99159581 ; CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407
Opis pliku:
File size 0,6 MB; application/octet-stream; Rozmiar pliku 0,6 MB
Relacje:
AEBR, 1997. The EU Initiative INTERREG and future developments. Association of European Border Regions, https://www.aebr.eu/files/publications/interreg_97.en.pdf [16 July 2018].; Bali L., 2012. A magyar-horvát határon átnyúló kapcsolatok jelene és jövője [Present and future of Hungarian-Croatian cross-border cooperation]. Underground Kiadó.; Bojar, E., 2008. Euroregions in Poland. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, vol. 5, pp. 442-447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1998.tb01576.x; Bundeskanzleramt, ÖSB Consulting, 2004. Systemische Evaluierung des Regionalmanagements in Österreich, Kurzfassung [Systematic evaluation of Regional managements in Austria, Summary]. http://archiv.bka.gv.at/DocView.axd?CobId=9550 [30 July 2018].; CADSES, 2006. INTERREG IIIB CADSES Project Book - Advancing Transnational Cooperation. http://www.interreg-central.de/fileadmin/ccp/Programm/CADSES_Projectbook.pdf [10 March 2016].; CBC, 2007. Operational Programme Cross-border Cooperation Slovenia-Austria 2007-2013. CCI Number: 2007CB163PO054.; CBC, 2013. Hungary-Croatia Cross-border Co-operation Programme. Programming document for the programming period 2007-2013. CCI Number: 2013CB163PO002, http://www.hu-hr-ipa.com/en/file_download/197 [7 September 2017].; CESCI, 2016. Crossing the Borders - Studies on cross-border cooperation within the Danube Region. Case Study the Euroregion Danube-Drava-Sava. Central European Service for Cross-border Initiatives, European Institute for Cross-border Studies. http://institute.cesci-net.eu/tiny_mce/uploaded/EUSDR_Part_Two_13_DanubeDravaSava.pdf [24 October 2016].; Csapó J., Čelan T. J., Trócsányi A., 2015. A határmenti együttműködés hatásai a területi fejlődésre a magyar-horvát szakasz példáján az EU tervezési mechanizmusának tükrében (2007-2013) [Impacts of cooperation in border areas on territorial development on example of the Hungary-Croatia border area, in light of the EU planning mechanism (2007-2013)]. Területfejlesztés és Innováció, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 22-31.; Delo, 2008. Slovenija išče konsenz o pokrajinah že več kot desetletje [Slovenia has been seeking consensus on the regions for more than a decade]. http://www.delo.si/novice/slovenija/slovenija-isce-konsenz-o-pokrajinah-ze-vec-kot-desetletje.html [20 July 2016].; Dubarle P., Mezei C., Pámer Z., 2011. Regional development programmes. [in:] G. Horváth, Z. Hajdú (eds.) Regional Transformation Processes in the Western Balkan Countries. Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre for Regional Studies, Pécs, pp. 570-601.; Đulabić V., Manojlović R., 2011. Administrative Aspects of Regional and Cohesion Policy in Croatia. [in:] Search of a Better Coordination of Parallel Processes. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, vol 11, no. 4, pp. 1041-1074.; EC, 2006. Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999.; Hajdú Z., 1996. Emerging conflict or deepening cooperation? The case of the Hungarian border regions. [in:] J. W. Scott et al. (eds.) Border Regions in Functional Transition: European and North American Perspectives on Transboundary Interaction. Institut für Regionalentwicklung und Strukturplanung, Berlin, pp. 193-211.; Harguindéguy J.-B., Bray Z., 2009. Does cross-border cooperation empower European regions? The case of INTERREG III-A France - Spain. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, vol. 27, pp. 747-760. https://doi.org/10.1068/c08119; INTERACT, 2015. Fact Sheet; Historical view of Interreg / European Territorial Cooperation. www.interact-eu.net/download/file/fid/2902 [16 July 2018].; Ivanišević S., Kopric ́I., Omejec J., Simovic J., 2001. Local Government in Croatia. [in:] E. Kandeva (ed.) Stabilization of Local Governments. Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative. Open Society Institute. Budapest.; Lados M., 2005. Programértékelés a 2000. évi Magyarország-Ausztria Phare CBC Kisprojekt Alap példáján [Programme evaluation on example of the year 2000 Hungary-Austria Phare CBC Small Project Fund]. Tér és Társadalom, vol. 2, pp. 101-126. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.19.2.1002; Land Steiermark, 2016. Neue Förderperiode EUREGIO Steiermark/Slowenien 2007-2013. http://www.raumplanung.steiermark.at/cms/beitrag/10820941/265384/ [10 March 2016].; Lindstrom N., 2005: Europeanization and sub-national governance in Slovenia. ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Granada, 15-19 April 2005, https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/76d206bf-5659-48c4-9d57-0c6887afa72c.pdf [8 June 2016].; Manzella G. P., Mendez C., 2009. The turning points of EU Cohesion policy. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/pdf/8_manzella_final-formatted.pdf [2 July 2018].; Nadalutti E., 2015. The Effects of Europeanization on the Integration Process in the Upper Adriatic Region. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16471-7; ÖREK, 2010. Ausgangslage und Trends, Herausforderungen und Anforderungen, Lösungsvorschläge und Empfehlungen zur österreichischen Raumpolitik. Ergebniszusammenfassung, Arbeitsgruppe V, Raumentwicklung. ÖREK, https://www.oerok.gv.at/fileadmin/Bilder/2.Reiter-Raum_u._Region/1. OEREK/OEREK_2011/AGs/5._AG_V_Raumentwicklung/B_Ergebniszusammenfassung_AG_V_Raumentwicklungspolitik.pdf [2 September 2017].; Pálné Kovács I., 2009. Europeanisation of Territorial Governance in Three Eastern/Central European Countries. Halduskultuur, 2009, vol. 10, pp. 40-57.; Pámer Z., 2007. The European integration and regional policy of the West Balkan countries. [in:] Z. Hajdú, I. Illés, Z. Raffay (eds.) Southeast-Europe: State Borders, Cross-Border Relations, Spatial Structures. Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Pécs, pp. 119-160.; Pámer Z., 2011. The possibilities of implementing the European Grouping of the Territorial Cooperation in South Transdanubia. [in:] A. Ágh, T. Kaiser, B. Koller (eds.) The New Horizons of the Cohesion Policy in the European Union: the Challenge of the Danube Strategy. Blue Ribbon Research Centre King Sigismund College, Budapest, pp. 176-194.; Perkmann M., 2003. Cross-border Regions in Europe. Significance and Drivers of Regional Cross-border Cooperation. European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776403010002004; Perkmann M., 2007. Policy entrepreneurship and multilevel governance: a comparative study of European cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, vol. 25, pp. 861-879. https://doi.org/10.1068/c60m; Popescu G., 2008. The conflicting logics of cross-border reterritorialization: Geopolitics of Euroregions in Eastern Europe. Political Geography, vol. 27, pp. 418-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.03.002; Rácz Sz., 2016. Horvátország térszerkezete [The spatial structure of Croatia]. Tér és Társadalom, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 81-104. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.30.3.2792; Rácz Sz., 2017. Main characteristics of Hungarian-Croatian political relations and Cross-border Co-operations. Geographica Pannonica, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 54-67. https://doi.org/10.5937/GeoPan1701054R; Rechnitzer J., 2012. A régiók az elmúlt 20 év területi politikájában [Regions in the past 20 years of territorial policy]. [in:] Z. Bajmócy, I. Lengyel, G. Málovics (eds.) Regionális innovációs képesség, versenyképesség és fenntarthatóság. JATEPress, Szeged, pp. 175-194.; RSRS, 2007. Revizijsko poročilo o INTERREG IIIA Slovenija-Avstrija. Proces izbora projektov v obdobju od 2004 do 2006 [Revision report about INTERREG IIIA Slovenia-Austria. Process of project selection in the period of 2004-2006]. Računsko sodišče Republike Slovenije, http://www.rs-rs.si/rsrs/rsrs.nsf/I/K8360171D0B911190C12573590054E715/$file/Interreg-IIIA.pdf [4 April 2016].; Scott J. W., 2013. Territorial Cohesion, Cross-border Co-operation and the EU's Political Identity: A Brief Observation. [in:] I. Pálné Kovács, J. Scott, Z. Gál (eds.) Territorial Cohesion in Europe - For the 70th anniversary of the Transdanubian Research Institute. Institute for Regional Studies, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Pécs, pp. 73-84.; Scott J. W., Liikanen I., 2010. Civil Society and the 'Neighbourhood' - Europeanization through Cross-Border Cooperation? [in:] J. W. Scott, I. Liikanen (eds.) European Neighbourhood through Civil Society Networks? Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2010.498628; Svensson S., Ocskay G., 2016. Overview of the EGTCs around Hungary. Central European Service for Cross-border Initiatives. http://cesci-net.eu/tiny_mce/uploaded/EGTC_Overview_CESCI_.pdf [24 October 2016].; Törvény, 2011. 2011. évi CLXXXIX. törvény Magyarország helyi önkormányzatairól [Act 2011: CLXXXIX on local governments of Hungary]. Text applicable on 18 January 2018.; van Houtum H., 2000. An Overview of European Geographical Research on Borders and Border Regions. Journal of Borderland Studies, vol. XV, no. 1, pp. 57-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2000.9695542; VÁTI, 2004. Az INTERREG Magyarországon - Kézikönyv [The INTERREG in Hungary - Handbook]. Technical Assistance for the INTERREG Programme and Project Development EuropeAid/116361/D/SV/HU.; Zimmermann F. M., Kubik K., 2003. Grenzüberschreitende Kooperationen: Der Raum Graz - Maribor [Cross-border cooperation: the Graz - Maribor area]. Ländlicher Raum, vol. 3, https://www.bmlfuw.gv.at/dam/jcr:f5e2c70d-7507-44dd-bba5-6254351bd795/Zimmermann_end2%5B1%5D.pdf [10 March 2016].; Zakon, 2007. Zakon o lokalni samoupravi [Local government act]. Uradni list RS 94/2007, Pročiščeno besedilo.; Zakon, 2009. Zakon o razvojni podpori Pomurski regiji v obdobju 2010-2017 [Pomurje region development subsidy act in the 2010-2017 period]. (ZRPPR1015), Uradni list RS 87/2009, 82/2015.; Zakon, 2011. Zakon o spodbujanju skladnega regionalnega razvoja [Act on promoting harmonious regional development]. (ZSRR-2), neuradno prečiščeno besedilo št. 2. Uradni list RS 20/2011, 57/2012, 46/2016.; Zakon, 2014. Zakon o regionalnom razvoju [Regional development act]. Narodne novine 174/2014.; Europa XXI; oai:rcin.org.pl:publication:94758; https://rcin.org.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/72535/content; oai:rcin.org.pl:72535
Dostępność:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1998.tb01576.x
https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.19.2.1002
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16471-7
https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776403010002004
https://doi.org/10.1068/c60m
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.03.002
https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.30.3.2792
https://doi.org/10.5937/GeoPan1701054R
https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2000.9695542
https://rcin.org.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/72535/content
Czasopismo naukowe
Szczegóły
Tytuł:
OTWARTOŚĆ TRANSGRANICZNA PLACÓWEK USŁUGOWYCH W MIEŚCIE PODZIELONYM GUBIN/GUBEN.
Autorzy:
Dołzbłasz, Sylwia
Pokaż więcej
Alternatywny tytuł:
TRANSBORDER OPENESS OF SERVICE PROVIDERS IN THE DIVIDED CITY OF GUBIN/GUBEN.
Źródło:
Research Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics / Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wroclawiu. 2015, Issue 391, p128-136. 9p.
Czasopismo naukowe
Pełny tekst  Link otwiera się w nowym oknieSzczegóły
Tytuł:
Europa XXI 38 (2020) ; Debating real integrated territorial cooperation approaches to post-2020 EU policies: the challenges arising from COVID-19 from the perspective of the Association of European Border Regions (AEBR) .
Autorzy:
Guillermo Ramirez, Martin. Autor
Pokaż więcej
Temat:
cross-border cooperation
cross-border obstacles & challenges
European Territorial Cooperation
ETC
European territorial integration
territorial cohesion
współpraca transgraniczna
przeszkody i wyzwania transgraniczne
Europejska Współpraca Terytorialna
europejska integracja terytorialna
spójność terytorialna
Źródło:
CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; http://195.187.71.2/ipac20/ipac.jsp?profile=geogpan&index=BOCLC&term=bb99159581 ; CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407
Opis pliku:
application/octet-stream
Relacje:
AEBR (2004). Towards a new community legal instrument facilitating public law based trans-European co-operation among territorial authorities in the European Union. Summary Position Paper. Gronau: Association of European Border Regions.; AEBR (2017). b-solutions project. Retrieved from https://www.b-solutionsproject.com/; AEBR (2020). b-solutions: Solving Border Obstacles. A Compendium of 43 Cases. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2776/239689; AEBR (2020). Annex. b-solutions: Solving Border Obstacles. A Compendium of 43 Cases. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2776/36819; AEBR (2020, May 19). Newsletter Spring 2020. "Covid-19" Special Edition. Association of European Border Regions. Retrieved from https://us9.campaign-archive.com/?u=1ac1f186b0d56a48c4d7dfc03&id=2972e850d2; AEBR (2020, August 3). Insight #2. Association of European Border Regions. Retrieved from https://us9.campaign-archive.com/?u=1ac1f186b0d56a48c4d7dfc03&id=b36010cdaa; Alliance (2020). European Cross-Border Citizens' Alliance. Borders at the Heart of Europe of Tomorrow. Association of European Border Regions, Central European Service for Cross-border Initiatives, Mission Opérationnelle Transfrontalière. Retrieved from http://www.espaces-transfrontaliers.org/en/activites-ue/european-cross-border-citizens-alliance/; Britannica (2020). Berlin West Africa Conference. Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/event/Berlin-West-Africa-Conference; Cebrián, J. L., & González, F. (2001). El futuro ya no es lo que era - una conversación [The future is no longer what it used to be]. Madrid: Aguilar.; Cohesion Alliance (2020, July 15). Europe's recovery will fail without a strong cohesion policy and a real partnership among EU, national, regional and local actors. European Committee of the Regions. Retrieved from: https://cor.europa.eu/en/news/Pages/Europe-recovery-will-fail-without-strongcohesion.aspx; COM (2015-2017). Cross-border Review. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/cooperation/european-territorial/cross-border/review/; COM (2017). Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council of 29 September 2017, COM(2017)0534 final.; COM (2017). White Paper on the Future of Europe. Reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025. European Commission. COM(2017)2025.; COM (2018). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a mechanism to resolve legal and administrative obstacles in a cross-border context. European Commission, COM(2018)373 final.; COM (2020). Proposal for a Regulation of the European parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards exceptional additional resources and implementing arrangements under the Investment for growth and jobs goal to provide assistance for fostering crisis repair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and preparing a green, digital and resilient recovery of the economy (REACT-EU). European Commission, COM(2020) 451 final.; COM (2020). Commission welcomes the political agreement on the Interreg Regulation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/newsroom/news/2020/12/12-02-2020-commission-welcomes-the-political-agreement-on-the-interreg-regulation; COM (2020). Interreg A - Cross-border cooperation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/cooperation/european-territorial/cross-border/#8; CoR (2018). The Cohesion Alliance. European Committee of the Regions. Retrieved from https://cor.europa.eu/en/engage/Pages/cohesion-alliance.aspx; CoR (2020). Register of European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation. Retrieved from https://portal.cor.europa.eu/egtc/CoRActivities/Pages/welcome.aspx; CoE (1980). European Outline Convention on Trans-Frontier Cooperation between Territorial Communities or Authorities. Treaty No. 106 signed by the Council of Europe's Committee of Ministers in Madrid on 21 May 1980 and entered into force on 22 December 1981. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/106; EC (1990). Notice C(90) 1562/3 to the Member States, laying down guidelines for operational programmes which Member States are invited to establish in the framework of a Community initiative concerning border areas (Interreg). European Communities, 90/C 215/04.; EC (1992). Treaty on European Union, signed at Maastricht on 7 February 1992. European Communities, 92/C 191/01.; EP (2020, July 22). Motion for a Resolution to wind up the debate on the statements by the European Council and the Commission pursuant to Rule 132(2) of the Rules of Procedure on the conclusions of the extraordinary European Council meeting of 17-21 July 2020. 2020/2732 (RSP).; EU (2006). Regulation (EU) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on a European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC). Official Journal of the European Union, L 210/19-24.; EU (2011). Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients' rights in cross-border healthcare. Official Journal of the European Union, L 88/45-65.; EU (2013). Regulation (EU) No 1302/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 on a European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC) as regards the clarification, simplification and improvement of the establishment and functioning of such groupings. Official Journal of the European Union, L 347/303-319.; EUCO (2020). Special meeting of the European Council on 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 July 2020 - Conclusions. European Council, EUCO 10/20, CO EUR 8 CONCL 4.; EUCO (2020). Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093 of 17 December 2020 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027. Official Journal of the European Union L 433 I/11-22, 22 December 2020.; EUCO (2020). Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2094 of 14 December 2020 establishing a European Union Recovery Instrument to support the recovery in the aftermath of the COVID-19 crisis. Official Journal of the European Union L 433 I/23-27, 22 December 2020.; EU Observer (2020, July 24). Top EU officials urge MEPs give quick budget-deal approval. EU Observer. Retrieved from https://euobserver.com/economic/149020; Euractiv (2020, May 28). Cohesion becomes central to EU recovery package. Euractiv. Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com/section/economy-jobs/news/cohesion-becomes-central-to-eu-recovery-package/; Event 201 (2019). Public-private cooperation for pandemic preparedness and response. A call to action. Event 201. Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/recommendations.html; Guillermo Ramírez, M. (2019). Introduction to the panel on Trust Building. AEBR Annual Conference 2019, Dresden City Hall, 24 October 2019.; Guillermo Ramírez, M. (2020). Europe is integrated within its borders. Newsletter of the Iberian-American and European Academy of Yuste Foundation, 6. Retrieved from https://www.fundacionyuste.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/02-TRIBUNA-ABIERTA-MartinvGuillermo-B06-v-in.pdf; Inglesby, T., & Toner, E. (2018, September 19). Opinion: Our lack of pandemic preparedness could prove deadly. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/our-lack-of-pandemic-preparedness-could-prove-deadly/2018/09/19/0d7b235c-b13e-11e8-a20b5f4f84429666_story.html; Martínez-Bascuñán, M. (2020, May 17). Globalización de geometría variable. El País. Retrieved from https://elpais.com/opinion/2020-05-16/globalizacion-de-geometria-variable.html; Monnet, J. (1978). Memoirs. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/MonnetJeanMemoirs/mode/2up; NTI (2019). Global Health Security Index. Building Collective Action and Accountability. Baltimore: Nuclear Threat Initiative, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Retrieved from https://www.ghsindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Global-Health-Security-Index.pdf; OECD (2020). Health Expenditure. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/health-expenditure.htm; Sloterdijk, P. (2020, June 12). Co-Immunism in the age of Pandemics and Climate Change. German philosopher Peter Sloterdijk speaks with Noema's editor-in-chief, Nathan Gardels. Noema Magazine, Berggruen Institute. Retrieved from https://www.noemamag.com/co-immunism-an-ethos-forour-age-of-climate-change/; TA2030 (2020). Territorial Agenda 2030. A future for all places. Adopted at the Informal meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development and/or Territorial Cohesion, 1 December 2020, Leipzig. Retrieved from https://territorialagenda.eu/home.html; WHO (2009). Recommendations for Good Practice in Pandemic Preparedness. Identified through evaluation of the response to pandemic (H1N1) 2009. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe. Retrieved from https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/128060/e94534.pdf; WHO (2020). Global Health Expenditure Database. World Health Organisation. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/nha/database/; Europa XXI; oai:rcin.org.pl:publication:217928; https://rcin.org.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/189104/content; oai:rcin.org.pl:189104
Dostępność:
https://doi.org/10.2776/239689
https://doi.org/10.2776/36819
https://rcin.org.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/189104/content
Czasopismo naukowe
Szczegóły
Tytuł:
Border politics in Central Europe: Hungary and the role of national scale and nation-building ; Geographia Polonica Vol. 91 No. 1 (2018)
Autorzy:
Scott, James Wesley. Autor
Pokaż więcej
Temat:
Central Europe
Hungary
borders
border politics
national scale
cross-border cooperation
Europa Środkowa
Węgry
granice
polityka graniczna
skala krajowa
współpraca transgraniczna
Źródło:
CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; http://195.187.71.2/ipac20/ipac.jsp?profile=geogpan&index=BOCLC&term=ee95400564 ; CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406
Opis pliku:
File size 1,0 MB; application/pdf; Rozmiar pliku 1,0 MB
Relacje:
Geographia Polonica; 1. ARRAIZA J.-M., 2015. Good neighbourliness as a limit to extraterritorial citizenship: The case of Hungary and Slovakia [in:] D. Kochenov, E. Basheska (eds.), Good neighbourly relations in the European legal context, Amsterdam: Brill Nijhoff, pp. 114-135.; 2. Bakk M., Öllös L. 2010. Politikai közösség és kulturális identitás Magyarország és a szomsédos országok magyar kisebbségeinek viszonyban [in:] B. Bitskey (ed.), Határon túli magyarság a 21 szazadban, Budapest: Koztársasági Elnöki Hivatal, pp. 41-68.; 3. Balogh P., 2014. Perpetual borders: German-Polish cross-border contacts in the Szczecin Area. Stockholm: Stockholm University.; 4. BARANYI B., 2001. A periféria perifériájá – egy kérdőives vizsgálat eredményei és tanulságai az Északkelet-Alföldi határ menti területein [in:] B. Baranyi (ed.) A Határmentiség kérdőjelei az Északkelet-Alföldön, Pécs: MTA Regioná lis Kutatá sok Kö zpontja, pp. 55-86.; 5. Baranyi B., 2008. Magyar–ukrán határrégió: Magyar–ukrán határrégió. Debrecen: MTA Regionális Kutatások Központja.; 6. Barta G., 2006. Hungary – the new border of the European Union. Discussion Papers of the Centre for Regional Studies, no. 54, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.; 7. Batory A., 2010. Kin-state identity in the European context: Citizenship, nationalism and constitutionalism in Hungary. Nations and Nationalism, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2010.00433.x; 8. BIHARI Z., KOVÁCS K., 2005. Slopes and slides: Spatial inequalities in employment opportunities at the turn of the millennium [in:] G. Barta, É .G. Fekete, I. Kukorelli Szö ré nyiné , J. Timár (eds.), Hungarian spaces and places: Patterns of transition, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, pp. 360-378.; 9. Blatter J., 2001. Debordering the world of states: Toward a multi-level system in Europe and a multi-polity system in North America? Insights from border regions. European Journal of International Relations, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 175-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066101007002002; 11. Bojar E., 2008. Euroregions in Poland. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 442-447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1998.tb01576.x; 12. Boldizsar I., 1988. In a good cause. New Hungarian Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 111, pp. 52-56.; 13. Brubaker R., 1996. Nationalism reframed. nationhood and the national question in the new Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558764; 14. Brusis M., 2005. The instrumental use of European Union conditionality: Regionalization in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. East European Politics & Societies, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 291-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325404272063; 15. BUFON M., MARKELJ V., 2010. Regional policies and cross-border cooperation: New challenges and new development models in Central Europe. Revista Romana de Geografia Politica, year XII, no. 1. pp. 18-28.; 16. De Sousa L., 2013. Understanding European crossborder cooperation: A framework for analysis. Journal of European Integration, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 669-687. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2012.711827; 17. Dołzbłasz S., 2013. Cross-border co-operation in the Euroregions at the Polish-Czech and Polish-Slovak borders. European Countryside, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 102-114. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2013-0007; 18. Dołzbłasz S., 2015. Symmetry or asymmetry? Cross-border openness of service providers in Polish-Czech and Polish-German border towns. Moravian Geographical Reports, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2015-0001; 19. Domaniewski S., Studzińska D., 2016. The small border traffic zone between Poland and Kaliningrad Region (Russia): The impact of a local visafree border regime. Geopolitics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 538-555. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1176916; 20. Eger G., 2000. Regionalism, the Euroregion as the specific spatial form of integration, Budapest: Osiris.; 21. Gorzelak G., Smętkowski M., 2007. Regional dynamics in Central and Eastern Europe. Paper presented at the International Conference "Regional Development in Central and Easter Europe", 20-22 September 2007, University of Warsaw, Poland.; 22. Gorzelak G., Smętkowski M., 2010. Regional development dynamics in Central and Eastern European countries [in:] G. Gorzelak, J. Bachtler, M. Smetkowski (eds.), Regional development in Central and Eastern Europe, London, New York: Routledge, pp. 34-58.; 23. HAJDÚ Z., 1995. A magyar államtér változásainak történeti és politikai földrajzi szemlélete a magyar földrajztudományban 1948-ig. Tér és Társadalom, vol. 9, no. 3-4, pp. 111-132.; 24. Hajdú Z., 1998. Changes in the politico-geographical position of Hungary in the 20th century. Discussion Papers, no. 22, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies.; 25. Hajdú Z., 2008. Kárpát-medence államosodási folyamatainak változásai és történeti földrajzi elemzésük. Korall, 31, pp. 75-100.; 26. Hajdú Z., Lux G., Kovács Pálné I., Somolyódné Pfeil E., 2009. Local dimensions of a wider European neighbourhood: Cross-border relations and civil society in the Hungarian–Ukrainian border area. Discussion Papers, no. 71, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies.; 27. HAKSZER R., 2017. A 2007-2013-as Magyarország-Szlovákia Határon Átnyúló Együttmüködési Program regionális aspektusai, megválositásának tapasztalatai. Tér és Társadalom, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 107-123.; 28. Hardi T., 2003. Az EU-csatlakozás hatása a határ menti térségek fejlődésére a Nyugat-Dunántúlon [in:] M. Kis, L. Gulyás, E. Erdélyi (eds.), Európai kihívások 2. Tudományos konferencia, Szeged: Szegedi Tudományegyetem Szegedi Élelmiszeripari Főiskolai Kar, pp, 158-162.; 29. Hardi T., 2010. Határ menti térségek, határon átnyúló kapcsolatok [in:] V. Szirmai (ed.), Közép-Dunántúl, Pécs–Budapest: MTA Regionális Kutatások Központja – Dialóg Campus Kiadó.; 30. Herrschel T., 2011. Borders in post-socialist Europe: Territory, scale, society. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.; 31. Horváth G. 2010. Territorial cohesion in the Carpathian Basin: Trends and tasks. Discussion Papers, no. 81, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies.; 32. Jacobs J., Varró K., 2014. Rethinking cross-border Euregionalism as a self-organising system. Space and Polity, vol. 18, no. 1, pp.1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2013.880009; 33. Jańczak J., 2013. Revised boundaries and re-frontierization. Border twin towns in Central Europe. Revue d'études comparatives Est-Ouest, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 53-92. https://doi.org/10.4074/S0338059913004026; 34. Jańczak J., 2014. Border twin towns in Europe Cross-border cooperation at a local level. Berlin: LogosVerlag.; 35. Jessop B., 2002. The political economy of scale and the construction of cross-border micro-regions [in:] F. Söderbaum, T. Shaw (eds), Theories of New Regionalism, pp. 179-196.; 36. KEMÉNYFI R., 2006. Az "ezeréves határok" etnikai területek legitimaciós eszközei a 20. század első felének földrajzban [in:] B. Bakó, R. Papp, L. Szarka (eds.), Mindennapi előítéletek. Társadalmi távolságok és etnikai sztereotípiák, Budapest: Balassi Kiádó, pp. 325-344.; 37. KOZAK M., 2014. Subregion Jelenia Góra as an example of border region – Case study report. GRINCOH Working Paper Series, Paper No. 6.03.02.01, http://www.grincoh.eu/media/serie_6_spaces__territories_and_regions/grincoh_wp6.03.02.01_kozak.pdf [23 May 2017]. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2000.9695548; 39. Lados M., 2005. A határmentiségtől az integrált határrégióig. Tér és Társadalom, vol. 19, no. 2, pp, 1-5.; 40. Leibenath M., Korcelli-Olejniczak E., Knippschild R. (eds.), 2008. Cross-border Governance and Sustainable Spatial Development. Berlin: Springer.; 41. Lepik K., 2012. Cross-border cooperation institutional organization. Saarbrücken: Lampert Publishing.; 42. Lepik K., 2009. Euroregions as mechanisms for strengthening of cross-border cooperation in the Baltic Sea region. TRAMES, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 265-284. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2009.3.05; 43. LUX G. (ed.), 2010. Environmental policy and the institutional system of environmental protection in the Carpathian Basin. Discussion Papers, no. 79, Environmental Policy and the Institutional System of Environment Protection in the Carpathian Basin, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.; 44. Medve-Bálint G., 2013. Incentives and obstacles to cross-border cooperation in post-communist Central Europe [in:] N. Bellini, U. Hilpert (eds.), Europe's changing geography: The impact of inter-regional networks, London-New York: Routledge, pp. 145-170.; 45. Medve-Bálint G., Svensson S., 2013. Diversity and development: Policy entrepreneurship of Euroregional initiatives in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2013.770630; 46. Mezei I., 2008. Városok Szlovákiában és a magyar határ mentén. Somorja-Pécs: MTA Regionális Kutatások Központja, Fórum Kisebbségkutató Intézet.; 47. Mønnesland J., 1999. Cross border programmes versus regional development programmes. The population density influence. Paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Conference, 21-24 September, Bilbao, Spain.; 48. NAGY G. 2011. Gyula – város a határon. A központi funkciók határon átnyúló hatása. Tér és Tarsadalom, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 127-147.; 49. NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, 2007. New Hungary Development Plan. National Strategic Reference Framework 2007-2013. Budapest: NDA.; 50. NEWMAN D., 2011. Contemporary research agendas in border studies: An overview [in:] D. WastlWalter (ed.), The Ashgate research companion to border studies. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 33-47.; 51. NAGY G., 2011. Gyula – város a határon. A központi funkciók határon átnyúló hatása. Tér és Tarsadalom, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 127-147.; 52. NAGY E., NAGY G., 2013. The layers of dependence and the changing role of the state – Conceptualising urban change in the East of Europe [in:] RC21 Conference – Resourceful cities. Konferencia helye, ideje: Berlin, Németország, 2013.08.29-2013.08.30. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität, Institute for Social Science, Department of Social Sciences Urban http://www.rc21.org/conferences/berlin2013/RC21-Berlin-Papers-3/03_2_enagy_gnagy.pdf. [15 October 2015].; 53. O'Dowd L., 2002. The changing significance of European borders. Regional and Federal Studies, vol. 12, no. 4), pp. 13-36.; 54. O'Dowd L., 2010. From a 'borderless world' to a 'world of borders': Bringing history back in. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1031-1050. https://doi.org/10.1068/d2009; 55. Orlowski W., 2010. The puzzles of convergence [in:] G. Gorzelak, J. Bachtler, M. Smętkowski (eds.), Regional Development in Central and Eastern Europe: Development processes and policy challenges, London-New York: Routledge, pp. 7-18.; 56. Paasi A., 2012. Border studies reanimated: Going beyond the territorial/relational divide. Environment and Planning A, vol. 44, pp. 2303-2309. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45282; 57. PAASI A., 2013. 2007-2013 Hungarian multilevel governance. With or without regions? [in:] I. Pálné Kovács, J W. Scott, Z. Gál (eds.), Territorial Cohesion in Europe, Budapest: Institute for Regional Studies Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, pp. 455-466.; 58. Perkmann M., 2007. Policy entrepreneurship and multilevel governance: A comparative study of European cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 861-879. https://doi.org/10.1068/c60m; 59. PERKMANN M., 2002. The rise of the Euroregion. A bird's eye perspective on European crossborder co-operation. Department of Sociology at Lancaster University http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/resources/sociology-online-papers/papers/perkmann-rise-of-euroregion.pdf [15 August 2017].; 60. Pickles J., 2010. The spirit of post-socialism: Common spaces and the production of diversity. European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 127-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776409356492; 61. Popescu G., 2008. The conflicting logics of crossborder reterritorialization: Geopolitics of Euroregions in Eastern Europe. Political Geography, vol. 27, no. 4, pp.418-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.03.002; 62. POPESCU G., 2006. Geopolitics of scale and crossborder cooperation in Eastern Europe: The case of the Romanian-Ukrainian-Moldovan borderlands [in:] J. Scott (ed.), EU enlargement, region building and shifting borders of inclusion and exclusion, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 35-51.; 63. Popescu G., 2011. Bordering and ordering the twenty-first century: Understanding borders. Lathham (MD): Rowman and Littlefield.; 64. Rácz S. (ed.), 2006. Regionális átalakulás a Kárpát medencében. Pécs: MTA Magyar Regionális Tudományi Társáság.; 65. Rechnitzer J., 2001. Border regions and national strat egy. Győr, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies.; 66. Rechnitzer J. (ed.), 1990. A nyitott határ. Győr: MTA Regionális Kutatá sok Központja.; 67. Sarmiento-Mirwaldt K., Roman-Kamphaus U., 2013. Crossborder cooperation in Central Europe: A comparison of culture and policy effectiveness in the Polish–German and Polish–Slovak border regions. Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1621-1641. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2013.832997; 68. SCOTT J.W., 2012. European politics of borders, border symbolism and cross-border cooperation [in:] T. Wilson, H. Donnan (eds.), A Companion to Border Studies, Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, pp 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118255223.ch5; 69. SCOTT J.W., SZALAI B., 2014. Case study report: Central Hungarian Region and Budapest Agglomeration. Working Paper Series, GRINCOH, Paper No. 6.06.01. http://www.grincoh.eu/media/serie_6_spaces__territories_and_regions/grincoh_wp6.06.01_scott_szalai.pdf [23 May 2017].; 70. Sohn C., 2014. The border as a resource in the global urban space: A contribution to the crossborder metropolis hypothesis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1697-1711. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12071; 71. Soós E., 2014. Endeavours to establish EGCTs on Hungary’s external borders [in:] L. Domínguez, I. Pires (eds.), Cross-border cooperation structures in Europe: Learning from the past, looking to the future, Brussels: P.I.E: Lang, pp, 213-227.; 72. SOÓS E., FEJES, Z., 2008. Hungarian experiences of cross-border cooperation. Fundamentum, no. 5, pp. 123-157.; 73. SOÓS E., FEJES, Z., 2007. The institutionalisation of cross-border cooperation systems in Hungary. Európai Tükör (June), pp. 104-121.; 74. Süli-Zakar I., (ed.), 2002. Borders and cross-border co-operations in the Central European transformation countries: Papers presented at the international workshop, Debrecen (Hungary) 1-2 October 2001. Debrecen: Kossuth Egyetemi K.; 75. SÜLI-ZAKAR I., CZIMRE K., (eds.) 2001. Carpathian Euroregion: Borders in the region, cross-border cooperation: European Study Centre Programme of the University of Debrecen: International workshop: Debrecen, Hungary, Oradea, Salonta, Romania, 16-17 December 1999. Debrecen: Kossuth Egy. K.; 76. Svensson S., 2015. The bordered world of crossborder cooperation: The determinants of local government contact networks within Euroregions. Regional & Federal Studies, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 277-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2015.1043995; 77. SVENSSON S., MEDVE-BÁLINT G., 2012. Explaining coverage: Why local governments in Central Europe do or do not join Euroregions? [in:] D.J. Andersen, M. Klatt, M. Sandberg (eds.), The border multiple: The practicing of borders between public policy and everyday life in a re-scaling Europe, Furnham: Ashgate, pp. 219-245.; 78. Van Houtum H., Van Naerssen T., 2002. Bordering, ordering and othering. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00189; 79. Varró K., 2008. Changing narratives on EU multi-level space in a globalizing era: How Hungary as a national space became part of the story. European Planning Studies, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 955- 969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802163751; oai:rcin.org.pl:publication:83578; https://rcin.org.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/64175/content; oai:rcin.org.pl:64175
Dostępność:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2010.00433.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1998.tb01576.x
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558764
https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2012.711827
https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2013-0007
https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1176916
https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2013.880009
https://doi.org/10.4074/S0338059913004026
https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2000.9695548
https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2009.3.05
Czasopismo naukowe
Szczegóły
Tytuł:
WSPÓŁPRACA TRANSGRANICZNA UKRAINY I POLSKI W STRUKTURZE STOSUNKÓW MIĘDZYNARODOWYCH NA PRZYKŁADZIE WYBRANYCH EUROREGIONÓW (ZARYS I PROBLEMATYKA).
Autorzy:
Osikowicz, Żanna
Pokaż więcej
Alternatywny tytuł:
CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION BETWEEN UKRAINE AND POLAND IN THE STRUCTURE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS WITH SELECTED EUROREGIONS AS CASE STUDIES (OUTLINE AND ISSUES).
Źródło:
Culture Management / Zarządzanie w Kulturze. 2017, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p237-249. 13p.
Czasopismo naukowe
Pełny tekst  Link otwiera się w nowym oknieSzczegóły
Wyświetlanie 1-20 z 1638

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies

Prześlij opinię

Twoje opinie są dla nas bardzo ważne i mogą być niezwykle pomocne w pokazaniu nam, gdzie możemy dokonać ulepszeń. Bylibyśmy bardzo wdzięczni za poświęcenie kilku chwil na wypełnienie krótkiego formularza.

Formularz